1) That the rate of decay happens to be constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances into the specimen dated haven’t been changed during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that whenever the stone first formed it contained a known amount of child product (« Radioisotopes and also the chronilogical age of the planet earth » pg v)
We ought to observe that past processes may never be occurring after all today, and therefore some could have taken place at rates and intensities far distinctive from comparable procedures today. ( « Radioisotopes in addition to chronilogical age of the planet earth » pg vii)
Jesus cursed the bottom (the stones too!)
See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 « ..cursed may be the ground for the benefit »
Whenever this occurred there was clearly a burst of radioactity that made the stones look over the age of they certainly were.
Would not this make most of the rocks look the age that is same?
« The stone real question is fairly easy and contains related to the fundamental elements which made these stones at the beginning. Whenever all these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it can simply be natural in order for them to act relating to their properties that are individual fundamentally acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various rates. Suppose at first every radioactive element had been « exploded » into presence from pre-existent elements. None among these early quicker half-lives will be the just like they’ve been today.
As time progressed each would commence to get its slow modern-day half-life that is stable but would each of them get these stable prices in a uniformity which may have them all in synchrony?